PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-34.92%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 24.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.94%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -8.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
182.43%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -57.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
6.64%
SBC growth while MU is negative at -23.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
1682.13%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -48.19%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-27.95%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-149.77%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -58.47%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
50.65%
AP growth of 50.65% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
260.97%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -35.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
121.53%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -362.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
67.96%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -34.40%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-15.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -19.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 86.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-1.55%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 37.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.61%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 58.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-2249.89%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-62.54%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.