PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-47.91%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -13.64%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.00%
Some D&A expansion while MU is negative at -5.38%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-24.59%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
0.38%
Less SBC growth vs. MU's 18.75%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-181.26%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -126.16%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-314.91%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
89.50%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -134.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
26.52%
AP growth of 26.52% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-174.24%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -119.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-160.65%
Negative yoy while MU is 316.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-102.24%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -47.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
35.99%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -30.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 3676.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-27.11%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -340.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
42.29%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 23.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-28.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -1836.36%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-2.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -92.47%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
95.20%
We repay more while MU is negative at -1.96%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
92.91%
Issuance growth of 92.91% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.