PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-55.23%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -77.72%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.30%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 48.63%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
71.70%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -359.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-6.63%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -26.67%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-94.40%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 12600.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
1192.19%
AR growth while MU is negative at -282.95%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
340.24%
Inventory growth well above MU's 322.22%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-38.96%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-131.42%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 485.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
85.39%
Well above MU's 121.66%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-61.05%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 110.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-37.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -87.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.51%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MU's 49.35%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-31.87%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 80.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-768.20%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 1708.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-63.17%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 103.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-9.30%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -832.91%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.