PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.82%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 94.49%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
3.51%
D&A growth well above MU's 3.70%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
180.05%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -40.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-3.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 22.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-828.21%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -66.93%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-165.64%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 107.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-116.35%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -101.05%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
131.35%
AP growth of 131.35% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
61.98%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -31.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
34.51%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -65.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-45.08%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -7.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-29.42%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 3.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.25%
Purchases well above MU's 16.84%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
214.86%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -2.47%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
55052.00%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -93.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
408.43%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -2347.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-2.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -69.61%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-650.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 26.19%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.