PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.11%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 8.77%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.43%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 3.03%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
247.68%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -1.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
5.88%
Less SBC growth vs. MU's 18.52%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
37.81%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -4.84%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
58.62%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. MU's 255.56%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
62.52%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -3450.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-111.56%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
24.60%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MU's 50.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-17.20%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -12.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
68.26%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 4.68%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
55.10%
CapEx growth well above MU's 3.56%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.83%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 13.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-70.35%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -12.66%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-100.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -54.55%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-126.32%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-3.04%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 8.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar buyback growth to MU's 93.55%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.