PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.74%
Net income growth at 50-75% of MU's 42.80%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-12.58%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 2.08%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-11.84%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
5.55%
SBC growth well above MU's 6.25%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
359.79%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -65.25%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
171.43%
AR growth while MU is negative at -246.88%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-195.87%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 208.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
1035.24%
AP growth of 1035.24% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
594.86%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -119.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
213.68%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -314.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
146.87%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -7.42%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-73.94%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -134.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
244.54%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. MU's 16233.33%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-239.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -317.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
66.89%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -28.26%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-150.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -2700.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-486.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -224.15%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
63.99%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MU's 38.19%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.