PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.66%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -4.07%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.75%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 5.09%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-13.80%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 83.33%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.50%
SBC growth while MU is negative at -4.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
253.87%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -165.07%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
196.15%
AR growth while MU is negative at -69.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-268.49%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 1466.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-149.98%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
452.03%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -181.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
49.95%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -78.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
105.33%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -22.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
21.88%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -140.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.99%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 61.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-4.07%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 14.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-114700.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 132.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1940.25%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 0.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-2.71%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 69.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.84%
We have some buyback growth while MU is negative at -63800.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.