PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-30.62%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -56.26%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
0.08%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 3.63%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
36.67%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -441.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
5.96%
Less SBC growth vs. MU's 12.20%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-115.82%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 236.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-79.87%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 430.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
159.91%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -331.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-82.45%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-110.75%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 256.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-19.77%
Negative yoy while MU is 77.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-44.44%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 8.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
3.37%
Lower CapEx growth vs. MU's 43.91%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.21%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 10.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
136.96%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 21.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
99.65%
Growth well above MU's 29.41%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
26.14%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. MU's 56.29%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-32.10%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 29.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-1372.22%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 78.87%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.