PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
846.15%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -123.96%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.04%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -2.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
13.51%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MU's 127.78%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
8.33%
SBC growth while MU is negative at -14.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-270.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -1108.70%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
62.71%
AR growth while MU is negative at -130.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
666.67%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -80.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-62.96%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-409.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -77.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-65.12%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -31.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
56.44%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -49.02%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
29.17%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -38.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -65.69%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-36.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -27.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-25.98%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 57.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-79.17%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 25.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-180.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -68.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar buyback growth to MU's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.