PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.77%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 205.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.17%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 7.64%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
22.22%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MU's 86.11%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-10.17%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 6.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-111.46%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -51.44%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-154.84%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -13266.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
228.57%
Inventory growth well above MU's 348.39%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
277.78%
AP growth of 277.78% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-140.88%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -121.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-14.29%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -86.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-39.53%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 27.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-266.67%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 34.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.96%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -33.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
14.47%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -12.23%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
20.00%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -28.35%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
182.63%
Investing outflow well above MU's 37.59%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
66.67%
We repay more while MU is negative at -3.87%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-270.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -1200.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.