PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.08%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 396.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.44%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 28.77%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
24.24%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -263.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
9.43%
Less SBC growth vs. MU's 19.57%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-1050.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -697.03%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-611.76%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 7.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-652.17%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -74.82%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
209.38%
AP growth of 209.38% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-3.57%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -1578.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-166.67%
Negative yoy while MU is 252.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-40.45%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 23.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
41.82%
CapEx growth well above MU's 8.93%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -209.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-0.14%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -77.60%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
250.00%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -880.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-252.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -402.92%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.20%
We have some buyback growth while MU is negative at -53.85%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.