PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
122.53%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 84.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
2.13%
D&A growth well above MU's 1.64%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
75.61%
Well above MU's 70.64% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
12.07%
SBC growth well above MU's 3.64%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-63.77%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 17.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-57.02%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -51.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-23.62%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -288.57%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-12.12%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-36.21%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 32.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
712.50%
Well above MU's 35.82%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
148.91%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 71.32%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-18.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -8.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.84%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MU's 80.13%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-22.62%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 143.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-83.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 118.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-21.56%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 80.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-44400.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -230.98%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-222.22%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 90.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.