PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.16%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 43.84%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.08%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 4.47%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-29.17%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 306.25%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.23%
SBC growth of 9.23% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
66.08%
Well above MU's 63.86% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
103.68%
AR growth well above MU's 44.60%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
27.39%
Inventory growth well above MU's 12.12%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-139.08%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
132.91%
Growth well above MU's 71.76%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-73.47%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -213.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
57.42%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 33.07%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-34.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -20.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.12%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -91.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
3.68%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -51.13%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-300.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -22.60%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-14.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -48.68%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
49.21%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x MU's 35.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-624.14%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.