PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.48%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 13.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.86%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 151.52%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
7.04%
SBC growth while MU is negative at -10.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-240.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -132.78%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-2242.86%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 61.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
76.32%
Inventory growth well above MU's 36.21%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-291.18%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-411.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -213.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
61.54%
Well above MU's 119.81%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-60.89%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 13.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-5.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -37.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
400.00%
Some acquisitions while MU is negative at -463.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
95.37%
Purchases well above MU's 33.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
50.53%
Below 50% of MU's 341.72%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-150.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 63.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
302.14%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -10.48%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-167.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -250.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
9.52%
Buyback growth of 9.52% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.