PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.17%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -23.81%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.56%
D&A growth well above MU's 3.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
109.86%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -33.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
2.38%
Less SBC growth vs. MU's 29.79%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-104.90%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 115.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
157.14%
AR growth well above MU's 133.93%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-103.28%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -26.55%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-65.08%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-119.08%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 452.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-260.00%
Negative yoy while MU is 145.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.41%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -6.69%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
71.63%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -18.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. MU's 2561.97%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-36950.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -702.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-32.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -7.43%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-171750.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -969.59%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-14695.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -107.94%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
77.78%
Debt repayment similar to MU's 83.16%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-1771.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -91700.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.