PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.50%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -50.70%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.51%
Some D&A expansion while MU is negative at -2.14%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
21.57%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MU's 325.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
3.10%
SBC growth while MU is negative at -6.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-1428.57%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 608.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-889.29%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 435.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-14550.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -79.72%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
581.82%
AP growth of 581.82% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
250.96%
Growth well above MU's 157.01%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-75.00%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -87.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-36.82%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -28.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-9.32%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 1.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.21%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MU's 74.65%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
915.44%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 202.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
80.31%
Growth well above MU's 111.32%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
77.33%
Investing outflow well above MU's 43.71%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x MU's 77.82%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.92%
Repurchase growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 60.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm invests enough in expansions while boosting EPS.