PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-53.98%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -31.14%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
14.71%
D&A growth well above MU's 4.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-315.66%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
13.77%
SBC growth well above MU's 15.52%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
152.99%
Well above MU's 113.64% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
242.55%
AR growth while MU is negative at -95.05%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
52.00%
Inventory growth well above MU's 58.64%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-790.38%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
852.17%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -18.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
23.08%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -503.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
84.39%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -17.63%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-35.33%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 15.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.21%
Purchases well above MU's 67.63%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-61.79%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -14.71%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-34.15%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 161.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-81.74%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 46.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
60.00%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x MU's 42.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-262.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 98.74%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.