176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-30.39%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -13.31%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
16.67%
Some D&A expansion while MU is negative at -9.12%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
87.83%
Deferred tax of 87.83% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
13.38%
SBC growth well above MU's 7.46%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-77.65%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -50.15%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-77.08%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -458.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
198.08%
Inventory growth well above MU's 182.16%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
65.74%
AP growth of 65.74% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-164.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -102.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
80.00%
Well above MU's 107.43%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-19.82%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -9.94%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
36.95%
CapEx growth well above MU's 5.17%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.96%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -0.74%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
75.53%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 0.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
567.90%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -98.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
3637.50%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -8.09%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
We repay more while MU is negative at -46.78%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.86%
We have some buyback growth while MU is negative at -4350.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.