PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
40.36%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -19.88%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.10%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 5.32%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
135.71%
Well above MU's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
25.28%
SBC growth well above MU's 18.06%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-50.50%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -11.59%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-275.27%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 250.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
47.06%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -251.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
163.41%
AP growth of 163.41% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
159.46%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MU's 3827.27%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
250.00%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -107.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
30.00%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -0.50%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
11.72%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -5.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.21%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 60.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
100.40%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -62.55%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
125.39%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MU's 640.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
137.12%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -43.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.30%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x MU's 21.35%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.