PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.79%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 22.98%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
15.22%
D&A growth well above MU's 10.20%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
4.55%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-1.35%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 8.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-58.60%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -17.27%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-292.38%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 53.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-56.86%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -3.57%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-23.53%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
2728.57%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -37.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
3050.00%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -71.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-10.67%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 12.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-39.81%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -17.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -368.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-99.85%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 127.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-100.15%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 1487.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-112.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -40.27%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.44%
We have some buyback growth while MU is negative at -9.09%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.