PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.17%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -24.91%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
277.57%
D&A growth well above MU's 4.17%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-600.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
66.96%
SBC growth well above MU's 5.43%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
171.31%
Well above MU's 285.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
117.67%
AR growth well above MU's 12.35%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
135.76%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 531.40%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-111.27%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
653.33%
Growth well above MU's 151.52%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-325.00%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -124.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
72.39%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 55.41%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-40.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -10.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-20891.18%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-756.52%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 65.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
128900.00%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 154.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-608.55%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 139.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1178.67%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 25.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.84%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x MU's 77.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x MU's 63.16%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.