PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.06%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 56.77%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-4.01%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 4.11%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-209.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 4300.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
8.88%
SBC growth while MU is negative at -3.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
112.65%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -62.05%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
125.27%
AR growth while MU is negative at -26.69%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-259.14%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -71.89%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-66.67%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 10.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
164.15%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -11.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-950.00%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -112.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
61.61%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 9.10%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
40.17%
CapEx growth well above MU's 10.80%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
102.51%
Acquisition growth of 102.51% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-42.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -118.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-16.54%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 6.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
80.57%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -1185.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-56.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -21.77%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.16%
We have some buyback growth while MU is negative at -762.67%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.