PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.16%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -1.86%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.78%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 4.25%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-870.83%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
8.39%
SBC growth well above MU's 9.32%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
56.45%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -115.85%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
5.38%
AR growth while MU is negative at -265.67%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
22.64%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -61.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
198.57%
Lower AP growth vs. MU's 454.76%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
316.67%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -129.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
113.97%
Well above MU's 22.22%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
43.12%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -7.87%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
38.59%
CapEx growth well above MU's 20.03%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-350.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-7.29%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 25.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-30.02%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -16.25%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
350.00%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -136.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-99.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -8.29%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.41%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
23.27%
We have some buyback growth while MU is negative at -57.53%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.