PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.79%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 16.04%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.20%
D&A growth well above MU's 4.54%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
88.65%
Well above MU's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
20.22%
SBC growth well above MU's 1.55%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-539.35%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -36.89%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
34.99%
AR growth while MU is negative at -676.58%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
4.07%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 55.76%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-6.70%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 84.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-841.00%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 412.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-152.63%
Negative yoy while MU is 6943.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-43.36%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 5.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-20.77%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 1.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-3960.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-41.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -10.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
12.58%
At 75-90% of MU's 14.48%. Bill Ackman would push for additional sales if those assets are non-strategic or have peaked in value.
-440.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 130.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-75.21%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 3.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
79.78%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MU's 15.63%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
7350.00%
Issuance growth of 7350.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-19.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -140.44%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.