PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.88%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -43.18%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.69%
D&A growth well above MU's 3.35%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-971.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.43%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 3.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
61.66%
Less working capital growth vs. MU's 154.28%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-89.07%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 227.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-216.95%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -319.92%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-6.15%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 31.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
113.77%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -418.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
840.00%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -103.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
99.67%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -1.59%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-23.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -40.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
70.44%
Acquisition spending well above MU's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-29.66%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 5.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
173.00%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -6.21%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
41.18%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -1306.25%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
64.24%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -47.93%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.32%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-41.69%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 20.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.