PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-59.46%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -1085.64%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
13.17%
D&A growth well above MU's 1.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
18.27%
Deferred tax of 18.27% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
12.11%
SBC growth well above MU's 7.53%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
101.76%
Well above MU's 4.50% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
115.23%
AR growth while MU is negative at -42.02%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-29.46%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 29.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
19.22%
AP growth well above MU's 30.02%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
159.25%
Growth well above MU's 77.78%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-99.86%
Negative yoy while MU is 8022.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-26.63%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -63.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-19.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 9.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
63.89%
Acquisition growth of 63.89% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
7.39%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -125.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-17.75%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 13.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
14.29%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MU's 192.13%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-38.06%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 15.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while MU is negative at -65.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.59%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.