PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
44.48%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 13.71%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-9.86%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -1.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-75.43%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-0.54%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 27.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
213.89%
Well above MU's 201.32% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-123.31%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -1531.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
180.17%
Inventory growth well above MU's 174.50%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
105.70%
AP growth well above MU's 179.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
446.23%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MU's 1004.69%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-166.67%
Negative yoy while MU is 235.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
29.44%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MU's 462.65%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
51.28%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -22.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-207.79%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 22.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-31.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 12.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-4.78%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -6.27%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-187.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -72.95%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-20925.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -87.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-1086.36%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 3.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.20%
Buyback growth of 58.20% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.