PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
202.89%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 164.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-4.95%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
34.27%
Deferred tax of 34.27% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
14.56%
SBC growth well above MU's 13.30%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-119.25%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -471.96%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1085.32%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -151.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-47.88%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -251.35%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
6972.73%
AP growth well above MU's 11.44%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
200.52%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -201.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-530.00%
Negative yoy while MU is 7101.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
118.07%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -12.99%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16.53%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 22.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
366.27%
Some acquisitions while MU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
9.25%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -33.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
3.46%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -5.88%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
3.17%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MU's 108.48%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
46.97%
Investing outflow well above MU's 26.12%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-378.93%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 7.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-504.93%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.