PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
49.37%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -58.13%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.92%
D&A growth well above MU's 1.61%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
28.95%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MU's 100.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
16.27%
SBC growth well above MU's 2.82%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-1470.69%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 98.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
58.39%
AR growth well above MU's 36.17%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-254.58%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 59.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-40.75%
Both negative yoy AP, with MU at -9.60%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-185.92%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 197.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
100.79%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -8.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.50%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MU's 103.61%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
3.81%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -50.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-110.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -142.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
11.20%
Below 50% of MU's 100.85%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-104.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -85.03%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-610.76%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -73.94%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
87.52%
We repay more while MU is negative at -1359.18%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.13%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.