PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.13%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 110.82%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.94%
D&A growth well above MU's 2.22%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-1921.79%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
1.71%
SBC growth well above MU's 3.29%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
148.52%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -428.84%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-40.00%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 19.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-14.71%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 146.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-107.83%
Both negative yoy AP, with MU at -122.54%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
1868.39%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -125.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
1338.38%
Growth of 1338.38% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
33.45%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -4.73%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-45.28%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.46%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 57.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
133.18%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 18.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-4576.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -6498.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
6.81%
Investing outflow well above MU's 12.51%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-191.09%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.