PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.54%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -15.35%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.61%
D&A growth well above MU's 2.41%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-7.74%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
14.05%
SBC growth well above MU's 13.18%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-299.04%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
25.32%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. MU's 241.37%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-39.17%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -277.65%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
3840.91%
A yoy AP increase while MU is negative at -96.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-97.71%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 515.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-107.38%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -688.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-5.58%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 21.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-164.77%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-612.82%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
39.14%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -16.45%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-1.06%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 4.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
94.44%
Growth well above MU's 1.25%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
44.07%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -0.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.52%
Buyback growth of 7.52% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.