PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
16.33%
Some net income increase while TSM is negative at -3.50%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
10.39%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
64.51%
Deferred tax of 64.51% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
8.59%
SBC growth while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
149.76%
Slight usage while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-101.53%
AR is negative yoy while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-21.67%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
105.22%
AP growth of 105.22% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
4124.14%
Some yoy usage while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-975.44%
Negative yoy while TSM is 270.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
21.67%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x TSM's 0.87%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
16.79%
CapEx growth well above TSM's 8.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
46.76%
Acquisition growth of 46.76% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
0.89%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. TSM's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-58.34%
Both yoy lines are negative, with TSM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
302.72%
We have some outflow growth while TSM is negative at -14.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-36.49%
We reduce yoy invests while TSM stands at 13.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.