PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.80%
Some net income increase while TSM is negative at -3.50%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
71.35%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-399.83%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.34%
Slight usage while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.59%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
172.03%
Some yoy usage while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
2.58%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. TSM's 270.57%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
62.89%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x TSM's 0.87%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
24.93%
CapEx growth well above TSM's 8.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
99.22%
Acquisition growth of 99.22% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while TSM is negative at -14.96%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
75.40%
Investing outflow well above TSM's 13.16%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.27%
Negative yoy issuance while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-216.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.