PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
33.01%
Some net income increase while TSM is negative at -3.50%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
12.19%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
81.61%
Deferred tax of 81.61% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-682.03%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-987.25%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-333.62%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
78.41%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. TSM's 270.57%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-66.51%
Negative yoy CFO while TSM is 0.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
10.84%
CapEx growth well above TSM's 8.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1203.26%
We reduce yoy invests while TSM stands at 13.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.69%
Negative yoy issuance while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
We have some buyback growth while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.