PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.30%
Net income growth at 75-90% of TSM's 25.46%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
22.89%
D&A growth well above TSM's 6.80%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
100.00%
Some yoy growth while TSM is negative at -54.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-706.91%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -122.63%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-151.09%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with TSM at -628.95%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
139.32%
Some yoy usage while TSM is negative at -50.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
89.29%
Some yoy increase while TSM is negative at -220.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-53.46%
Negative yoy CFO while TSM is 11.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-158.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -40.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.00%
Some yoy expansion while TSM is negative at -313.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
15.17%
Liquidation growth of 15.17% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.48%
We have mild expansions while TSM is negative at -124.99%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.43%
Issuance growth of 53.43% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.