PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.66%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with TSM at -24.95%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-3.57%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with TSM at -29.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-100.69%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-25.75%
Negative yoy SBC while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
115.01%
Less working capital growth vs. TSM's 1009.95%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
79.44%
AR growth well above TSM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-102.10%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 143.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
158.78%
A yoy AP increase while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
97.33%
Some yoy usage while TSM is negative at -0.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-100.18%
Both negative yoy, with TSM at -43.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
6579.03%
Some CFO growth while TSM is negative at -22.79%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-50.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -197.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above TSM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-58.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while TSM stands at 74.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-12.28%
We reduce yoy sales while TSM is 789.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while TSM is 99.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-344.73%
We reduce yoy invests while TSM stands at 1.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.64%
Issuance growth of 89.64% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.