PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.80%
Negative net income growth while TSM stands at 34.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.74%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -4.46%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
99.93%
Well above TSM's 139.35% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-99.93%
Negative yoy SBC while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-75.77%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -3924.79%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
65.49%
Inventory growth of 65.49% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-203.16%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -3924.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
177.25%
Some yoy increase while TSM is negative at -140.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-66.26%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with TSM at -9.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
2.69%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -80.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
27.78%
Purchases well above TSM's 10.33%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
218.65%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x TSM's 54.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
100.00%
Growth well above TSM's 88.67%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
90.46%
Investing outflow well above TSM's 25.20%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while TSM is 24.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-149.96%
We cut yoy buybacks while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.