PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.11%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with TSM at -23.57%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-8.63%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with TSM at -8.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-331.25%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-59.60%
Negative yoy SBC while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
336.79%
Well above TSM's 78.22% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
143.06%
AR growth well above TSM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
8.02%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. TSM's 2975.54%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
188.76%
A yoy AP increase while TSM is negative at -2310.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
59.50%
Growth well above TSM's 78.22%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-19.83%
Negative yoy while TSM is 51.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
33.03%
Some CFO growth while TSM is negative at -10.11%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
50.29%
CapEx growth well above TSM's 28.52%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above TSM's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-542.02%
Negative yoy purchasing while TSM stands at 59.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
167.39%
We have some liquidation growth while TSM is negative at -37.97%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
100.00%
Growth well above TSM's 35.72%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
75.51%
Investing outflow well above TSM's 77.48%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.72%
Negative yoy issuance while TSM is 123.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-25.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.