PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
30.60%
Net income growth above 1.5x TSM's 10.16%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.78%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -10.38%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
100.00%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. TSM's 208.47%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-45.34%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -173.06%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
143.65%
Some inventory rise while TSM is negative at -191.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while TSM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
107.43%
Some yoy usage while TSM is negative at -173.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
84.10%
Well above TSM's 34.44%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
8.03%
Some CFO growth while TSM is negative at -24.93%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
20.07%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -45.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.02%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. TSM's 161.52%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-25.56%
Both yoy lines are negative, with TSM at -87.51%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.43%
We have mild expansions while TSM is negative at -203.94%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.13%
We slightly raise equity while TSM is negative at -12.07%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
0.49%
We have some buyback growth while TSM is negative at -116.23%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.