PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.05%
Some net income increase while TSM is negative at -57.44%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
11.83%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -12.04%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-20.59%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-193.15%
Negative yoy working capital usage while TSM is 579.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.86%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 272.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-131.76%
Negative yoy usage while TSM is 822.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-170.42%
Both negative yoy, with TSM at -54.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-33.58%
Negative yoy CFO while TSM is 4.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-41.52%
Negative yoy CapEx while TSM is 2.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.47%
Negative yoy purchasing while TSM stands at 46.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
57.85%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x TSM's 4.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.44%
We reduce yoy invests while TSM stands at 229.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -538.31%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-42.42%
We cut yoy buybacks while TSM is 99.25%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.