PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-168.40%
Negative net income growth while TSM stands at 1467.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
11.96%
Some D&A expansion while TSM is negative at -2.10%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-182.21%
Negative yoy deferred tax while TSM stands at 150.02%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
213.49%
Slight usage while TSM is negative at -601.40%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-100.00%
AR is negative yoy while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
80.39%
Some inventory rise while TSM is negative at -4237.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
Lower AP growth vs. TSM's 1626.73%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
708.31%
Some yoy usage while TSM is negative at -118.26%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
570.31%
Some yoy increase while TSM is negative at -172.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-44.26%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with TSM at -8.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
73.53%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -29.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while TSM is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-34.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while TSM stands at 89.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-51.50%
Both yoy lines are negative, with TSM at -88.18%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
314.53%
We have some outflow growth while TSM is negative at -954.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-811.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -173.66%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-68.73%
Negative yoy issuance while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.