PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-339.14%
Negative net income growth while TSM stands at 6.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.53%
Negative yoy D&A while TSM is 1.38%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-524.40%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
155.21%
Well above TSM's 286.93% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.81%
Inventory growth of 86.81% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
403.71%
Growth of 403.71% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
10.77%
Some yoy increase while TSM is negative at -104.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-146.15%
Negative yoy CFO while TSM is 32.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
60.58%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -33.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.75%
Some yoy expansion while TSM is negative at -208.03%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-70.22%
We reduce yoy sales while TSM is 811.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-664.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while TSM is 189.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-12.36%
We reduce yoy invests while TSM stands at 8.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.51%
Negative yoy issuance while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.