PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-36.35%
Negative net income growth while TSM stands at 3.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.42%
D&A growth well above TSM's 3.58%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
38.10%
Some yoy growth while TSM is negative at -13.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
41.63%
SBC growth of 41.63% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
123.12%
Slight usage while TSM is negative at -180.29%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-95.75%
AR is negative yoy while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
1839.83%
Some inventory rise while TSM is negative at -2.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
103.38%
A yoy AP increase while TSM is negative at -228.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-214.54%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -148.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-110.28%
Both negative yoy, with TSM at -2.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
816.19%
Some CFO growth while TSM is negative at -25.75%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
51.65%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -8.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while TSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-162.41%
Negative yoy purchasing while TSM stands at 27.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
137.66%
We have some liquidation growth while TSM is negative at -22.44%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while TSM is negative at -103.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
71.60%
We have mild expansions while TSM is negative at -19.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
481.78%
Issuance growth of 481.78% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.