PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
202.16%
Net income growth above 1.5x TSM's 16.53%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-1.12%
Negative yoy D&A while TSM is 5.87%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
117.85%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. TSM's 534.28%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-9.43%
Negative yoy SBC while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-124.83%
Negative yoy working capital usage while TSM is 91.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
4.04%
AR growth of 4.04% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-97.43%
Negative yoy inventory while TSM is 11.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-18.55%
Both negative yoy AP, with TSM at -100.22%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-130.37%
Negative yoy usage while TSM is 107.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-74.93%
Both negative yoy, with TSM at -1012.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
4.59%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of TSM's 30.71%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
6.02%
Lower CapEx growth vs. TSM's 20.10%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.86%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. TSM's 58.23%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-2.06%
Both yoy lines are negative, with TSM at -36.20%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-227.88%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -1983.60%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
27.19%
Investing outflow well above TSM's 16.93%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
We repay more while TSM is negative at -1372.77%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
506.84%
Issuance growth of 506.84% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.