PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.97%
Some net income increase while TSM is negative at -12.37%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.60%
Negative yoy D&A while TSM is 6.49%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
211.24%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. TSM's 960.77%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
2.26%
SBC growth of 2.26% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-70.14%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -177.57%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-773.73%
AR is negative yoy while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-7.05%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with TSM at -94.05%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-26.15%
Both negative yoy AP, with TSM at -1117.47%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
71.54%
Some yoy usage while TSM is negative at -104.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
170.05%
Well above TSM's 53.33%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-107.79%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with TSM at -19.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
24.34%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -82.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.71%
Some yoy expansion while TSM is negative at -1750.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
45.70%
At 50-75% of TSM's 83.58%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.79%
We have mild expansions while TSM is negative at -66.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-173.79%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TSM is 90.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
37.58%
Issuance growth of 37.58% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-100.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.