PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
160.20%
Some net income increase while TSM is negative at -15.45%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.65%
Less D&A growth vs. TSM's 2.97%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
150.85%
Well above TSM's 109.82% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
2.22%
SBC growth of 2.22% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-68.65%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -241.90%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-102.52%
AR is negative yoy while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
221.91%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. TSM's 1747.07%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
154.11%
A yoy AP increase while TSM is negative at -17.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-145.60%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -898.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-112.97%
Both negative yoy, with TSM at -58.80%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
517.80%
Some CFO growth while TSM is negative at -12.45%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
42.03%
CapEx growth well above TSM's 41.19%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.21%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. TSM's 99.76%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-34.11%
Both yoy lines are negative, with TSM at -95.86%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
91.41%
Growth well above TSM's 47.78%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-37.68%
We reduce yoy invests while TSM stands at 5.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-3.08%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TSM is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
77.68%
Issuance growth of 77.68% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.