PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.09%
Net income growth under 50% of TSM's 24.91%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
9.20%
D&A growth well above TSM's 15.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
38.65%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. TSM's 185.99%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
13.26%
SBC growth of 13.26% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-321.52%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -103.38%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1188.16%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TSM at -12.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
193.84%
Some inventory rise while TSM is negative at -3.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-215.57%
Both negative yoy AP, with TSM at -24.53%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-15.91%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -128.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
74.88%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. TSM's 1813.81%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-52.37%
Negative yoy CFO while TSM is 22.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
25.23%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -22.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.67%
Some yoy expansion while TSM is negative at -1459.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
85.70%
We have some liquidation growth while TSM is negative at -24.81%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-293.47%
We reduce yoy other investing while TSM is 78.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-8.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -22.34%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-7.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TSM is 99.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-53.69%
Negative yoy issuance while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.