PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-47.91%
Negative net income growth while TSM stands at 10.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.00%
D&A growth well above TSM's 0.80%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-24.59%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
0.38%
SBC growth while TSM is negative at -4.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-181.26%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -228.05%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-314.91%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TSM at -207.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
89.50%
Inventory growth well above TSM's 99.94%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
26.52%
A yoy AP increase while TSM is negative at -349.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-174.24%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -91.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-160.65%
Both negative yoy, with TSM at -91.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-102.24%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with TSM at -13.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
35.99%
Some CapEx rise while TSM is negative at -36.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while TSM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-27.11%
Negative yoy purchasing while TSM stands at 99.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
42.29%
Below 50% of TSM's 110.90%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-28.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while TSM is 14.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-2.00%
We reduce yoy invests while TSM stands at 14.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
95.20%
We repay more while TSM is negative at -106.58%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
92.91%
Issuance growth of 92.91% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.