PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
75.63%
Some net income increase while TSM is negative at -1.11%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.70%
Less D&A growth vs. TSM's 6.16%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
184.35%
Deferred tax of 184.35% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
2.52%
SBC growth while TSM is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-327.22%
Negative yoy working capital usage while TSM is 27.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.62%
AR growth well above TSM's 106.18%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
6.94%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. TSM's 270.76%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-151.50%
Both negative yoy AP, with TSM at -152.88%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-838.58%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -179.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-100.06%
Negative yoy while TSM is 102.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-9.66%
Negative yoy CFO while TSM is 27.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
27.86%
CapEx growth well above TSM's 29.86%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.12%
Negative yoy purchasing while TSM stands at 94.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-16.47%
Both yoy lines are negative, with TSM at -84.62%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
172.82%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. TSM's 484.23%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-115.81%
We reduce yoy invests while TSM stands at 31.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-3.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with TSM at -218.98%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.