PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
23.82%
Net income growth at 50-75% of TSM's 39.02%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
3.51%
Less D&A growth vs. TSM's 10.47%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
180.05%
Deferred tax of 180.05% while TSM is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-3.00%
Negative yoy SBC while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-828.21%
Both reduce yoy usage, with TSM at -593.89%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-165.64%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with TSM at -495.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-116.35%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with TSM at -24.83%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
131.35%
Lower AP growth vs. TSM's 538.08%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
61.98%
Some yoy usage while TSM is negative at -36.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
34.51%
Some yoy increase while TSM is negative at -1702.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-45.08%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with TSM at -13.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-29.42%
Negative yoy CapEx while TSM is 36.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.25%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. TSM's 56.80%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
214.86%
Below 50% of TSM's 574.96%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
55052.00%
Growth well above TSM's 423.71%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
408.43%
Investing outflow well above TSM's 42.61%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-2.95%
We cut debt repayment yoy while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-650.00%
We cut yoy buybacks while TSM is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.